Maybe you just end up oranging a bunch of stuff? Though I would prefer it over APDS in a number of cases. HEATFS is also heavier, slower, and less accurate vs APFSDS. The M1A2 Abrams uses an Honeywell AGT1500C multi fuel turbine engine … We do know that the M-1 can resist the 125mm from the T-72 at least, right? 5,961. All trademarks are property of their respective owners in the US and other countries. Current APFSDS rounds, on the other hand, cannot achieve the same degree of penetration (into RHA). #2 charge weight 3400g Charge composition 15/1tr V/A pyroxyline, later updated to 12/7 V/A pyroxyline Max.dispersion 0.25mil EFC rating 3-5 depending on a model of round and gun Rear tracer burn time at least out to 2000m With most APFSDS I just aim center mass. Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America). Just wanted to clarify. This is a subreddit for War Thunder, a cross platform vehicular combat MMO developed by Gaijin Entertainment for Microsoft Windows, macOS, Linux, PlayStation 4, and Xbox One. It’s claimed that the new armour offers protection levels of 1000–1100 mm vs APFSDS and 1200–1400 mm vs HEAT. Like all Assault Rifles in … Almost to the KPZ and T64. Ok thanks for the answers. APCR vs APFSDS. So I wanted to ask: Is there any advantage HEAT/HEAT-FS posesses over APFSDS/APDS, except the same penetration at all ranges? The first hit with HEATFS can go so many different ways. I don't understand... APFSDS is a more modern shell I believe. Note: This is ONLY to be used to report spam, advertising, and problematic (harassment, fighting, or rude) posts. apfsds for sale, The AEK-971 is a Soviet / Russian select-fire assault rifle made by the Kovrov Machinebuilding Plant in the 1980s. Omsk built five T-80Us and Nizhny Tagil built fifteen T-72s, and both built more in the hopes of winning large ex… The big advantage is really penetration and chance to do so, especially at range. For Russia, it's neighboring allies, and Brazil, they had the T-99 Armata. Not 100% sure though so take it with a grain of salt. M1A2 Abrams. Spalling. It fires the 5.45x39mm WP cartridge. So, I have mostly used APFSDS and APDS shells in rank V and VI and never really bothered with HEAT/HEAT-FS. peshawar. Because HEAT-FS suffers immensely against spaced, composite and explosive reactive armor whereas this is no big deal for APFSDS. Armor Piercing (AP) 1.2. T-80B – Hull 440–450 mm vs APFSDS 500–575 mm vs HEAT, Turret 500 mm vs APFSDS 650 mm vs HEAT; T-80U – Hull & Turret with Kontakt-5 780 mm vs APFSDS 1,320 mm vs HEAT; Main armament. The only time I use HEAT warhead rounds are Tier I German 75mm and ATGM's and both are not very common for me. This new ERA (reportedly named as Malachite) is visible on the vehicle (marked as 1. on the above image) by its shape/lines. By 1992, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced that it could no longer afford to manufacture two main battle tanks in parallel. The round is specifically modeled for the 120 mm M256 main gun on the Abrams M1A1 and M1A2 main battle tanks. It would still be less efficient than either the M833 APFSDS or the M829. Post Aug 19, 2009 #1 2009-08-19T05:19. i have a question it may sound stupid but ... EFP's are by definition HEAT weapons. Penetration of APFSDS with steel tip vs conventional tip: Posted by m.m. Note that the penetration values below ("RHAe" in milimeters) are line of sight (LOS) estimations measured at the muzzle against a semi-infinite target meeting the specifications for a NATO single heavy type array. Other then that, the downsides are quite rough, especially in terms of post pen damage. Unlike HEAT, Also known as high explosive squash head (HESH). I generally only use HEATFS in my tanks if they lack APFSDS. As to Hotfire90s statement with the spaced armor: Spaced and composite armors were, for the most part, made with the intend to stop HEAT and HEAT-FS grenades, so there is that. Because other than that, it has bigger drop, can be stopped by 5mm spaced armor, has bad post pen effects if no fuel/ammo is hit, if not default … Depends on the armour, the MBT-70's armour is less effective against HEAT rounds, for example. The game is based around combined arms battles on air, land, and sea with vehicles from the Spanish Civil War to today. Maybe it doesn’t find anything? K-5, Relict, and Nozh reduce the effect of kinetic rounds by between 20 and 75% depending on where the round hits the ERA. APFSDS is most effective against modern heavy armour, because they're designed to resist HEAT rounds. The 120mm KE-W A1® APFSDS-T cartridge has been developed to provide state-of-the-art tungsten Armor-Piercing, Fin-Stabilized, Discarding Sabot-Tracer (APFSDS-T) cartridges for 120mm smoothbore cannons. I got the depleted uranium figure from a Tom Clancy book about armoured warfare (NOT one of his novels, it's a factual book), also another book about Armoured Warfare in … Armor [edit | edit source]. Armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS), long dart penetrator, or simply dart ammunition, is a type of kinetic energy penetrator ammunition used to attack modern vehicle armour.As an armament for main battle tanks, it succeeds armour-piercing discarding sabot (APDS) ammunition, which is still used in small or medium caliber weapon systems. So, I have mostly used APFSDS and APDS shells in rank V and VI and never really bothered with HEAT/HEAT-FS. Armor Piercing Composite Rigid (APCR) 1.4. However, these estimations are usually achieved using the Odermatt equation, which is a perforation equation, and often against an oblique plate. Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. The M829 is an American armor-piercing, fin-stabilized, discarding sabot tank round.Modeling was designed at the Ballistic Research Laboratory (BRL) at Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), which was incorporated into the Army Research Laboratory (ARL) in 1992. Maybe you just kill a crew member that doesn’t stop return fire? The M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank, named after General Creighton Abrams, entered service in 1980 and remains the United States’ front line tank as the M1A2 (from 1992). Steel-composite-reactive blend vs APFSDS: 550-650mm, wi Kontakt-5 = 800–830mm; vs HEAT: 650-850mm wi Kontakt-5 = 1,150–1,350mm: Main airmament. It was the most heavily protected tank the SCO had. level 1 Produced by General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, the KE-W A1® provides a high-performance alternative to depleted uranium projectiles. APFSDS rounds such as the DM63 or M829A3 are often estimated as having around 6 calibers of penetration. It consists of a fin stabilized subprojectile, a tracer assembly attached to the rear of the fin and a depleted uranium (DU) or tungsten penetrator with a ballistic tip to reduce drag. APFSDS vs ERA. And yeah, these armors also work well against HESH because of the spalling innetween the armor plates. at 11:01 AM. Armor Piercing Incendiary (AP-I) 1.5. Weighing in at 55 tons, it had a high degree of mobility with a Honeywell AGT1500C multi-fuel turbine engine, generating 1500 hp and giving the tank a top speed of 45 mph (72.5 km/h). Armor Piercing Ballistic Cap (APBC) 1.3. I don’t believe WT has that modelled, but it’s an impressive feature of the round. Also the post-pen fragmentation pattern for APFSDS is WAYYYY more devastating than the lame needle-point straight lined damage that we get from majority HEAT-FS rounds in the game! Armour-piercing discarding sabot (APDS) is a type of kinetic energy projectile fired from a rifled-barrel gun to attack armoured targets. Th… The XM827 APFSDS was a 120 mm DM13 APFSDS with DU instead of tungsten penetrator, it still had a steel sheating and the same internal design as DM13. Being able to pen a tank is nice, being able to actually do damage is nicer. An APFSDS-T Shell in real-life. The sub-classes of AP include but are not limited to: 1. Its frontal hull armor RHA equivilency was 2150mm vs APFSDS and 2500mm vs HEAT and the turret's frontal armor was equivalent to 1700mm vs APFSDS and 2000mm vs HEAT. T-90A has a better armor than M1A2 Abrams.The M1A2 Abrams armor is 600 (780 mm) mm vs APFSDS, 800 mm (1,060 mm) vs HEAT,but the T-90A armor is s teel-composite-reactive blend vs APFSDS: 700–800 (950mm)mm; vs HEAT: 780–1000 (1,600mm)mm. Maybe the jet finds ammo? Press J to jump to the feed. “The AMP adds an important new capability. Also the post-pen fragmentation pattern for APFSDS is WAYYYY more devastating than the lame needle-point straight lined damage that we get from majority HEAT-FS rounds in the game! Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It was the cheapest and most efficient of all 3 tanks. Since both the "quality" T-80U and the cheaper "quantity" T-72B were being built at different plants, and each plant was critical to the economy of its city, the government gave small orders to both. On the other hand, what do we really know about the Chinese 140mm HEAT or APFSDS vs. the M-1's armor? For that you’d probably fire a M830A1 HEAT round. Why do most people use sabots rather than HEAT? © Valve Corporation. Because other than that, it has bigger drop, can be stopped by 5mm spaced armor, has bad post pen effects if no fuel/ammo is hit, if not default one shot costs a fortune and (except ATGMs) is borderline useless against composite armor... And all that for a little bit more penetration at every range? Its modeled, most apfsds rounds pretty much ignore slopes, Well they also cost too much at later tiers, Apfsds has better ballistics than heatfs so it's easier to hit targets, apfsds also has better post pen damage because there's more shrapnel and the sabot is still going through the tank and this 5-10kg projectile will still damage or kill anything it passes through, Well I can't wait to get to high tier. Army DA administrative publications and forms by the Army Publishing Directorate APD. and (3) = 760 vs HEAT and 550 vs APFSDS So with some basic maths you find the total to be 2220 vs HEAT and 1500 vs APFSDS. But that too is designed for maximum effect vs. armor rather than concrete. APFSDS darts also “normalize” themselves when penetrating angles. So I wanted to ask: Is there any advantage HEAT/HEAT-FS posesses over APFSDS/APDS, except the same penetration at all ranges? The Armata is also fitted with modular armor along the … Email This BlogThis! APFSDS has a devastating spall cone. Because HEAT-FS suffers immensely against spaced, composite and explosive reactive armor whereas this is no big deal for APFSDS. The Armor Piercing, Fin Stabilized, Discarding Sabot - Tracer (APFSDS-T) cartridge is a type of kinetic energy (KE) armor defeating round. APFSDS is essentially better in most cases then HEAT (FS) is in my view. Material Type: Tungsten, DU or Steel Case of Penetration: Only Tungsten available 1 - Total length of penetrator material (mm) Armor Piercing Discar… Higher penetration. To sum it up, the first hit with APFSDS is generally a OHK, and if not it is devastating to crew and modules. Obviously,HEAT is a better anti-tank round than HESH.But its not that simple.Ask yourself....if im a tank commander,and i see a modern MBT in my sights,am i going to use HEAT or APFSDS?Obviously APFSDS,since modern MBTs are ALSO very effectively protected against HEAT,and APFSDS is the ultimate tank killing round. 5,961. peshawar. Incr. Drive the shot right been the driver and MG/Radio op, the initial rupture will kill them both, while the spall cone chews up turret crew, and the dart continues until it either passes clean through the engine or is stopped by the engine and fuel. Just need people to roll with, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Personally, I've always been one to pick KE ammo over HEATFS (never wanted to pay 1000+ SL per shot for the post pen damage it does) and APFSDS creates enough spalling to wipe crews clean and great at setting off ammo. The original M1 Abrams was armed with a 105 mm M68A1 rifled cannon and was the US military’s first vehicle that was deployed with base composite armor. It’s not designed to breach buildings. HEAT will pen nearly all high tier tanks jusdt as well as Sabots can but I see most use Sabot in T64s and KPZs. The latest technologies high quality electronic pubs and forms view U.S. Army Regulations and DA Forms. To the best of my knowledge, HEAT is more effective against medium and light armour, or vintage heavy armour, because it has less-to-no risk of over-penetrating the target. The M829 is an APFSDS round, a kinetic kill anti-tank munition that does its damage via spawling and hydrodynamic shock effects. 125MM APFSDS ROUNDS Common properties. 7 comments: Warren February 28, 2016 at 10:36 PM. Armor Piercing, mostly known as AP, is the general name for a large group of kinetic energy penetrators, which focus on punching through armor with the amount of energy the shell can impact the target with. A kinetic energy penetrator (KEP, KE weapon, long-rod penetrator or LRP) is a type of ammunition designed to penetrate vehicle armour using a flechette-like, high-sectional density projectile.Like a bullet, this type of ammunition does not contain explosive payloads and uses purely kinetic energy to penetrate the target. Engine [edit | edit source]. 1.1. wave knocks a scab off the inside of the armor plate which bounces around the interior of the target at high speed. Labels: APFSDS, ERA, estimates, M829, tank ammunition, USA. HEATFS is more a needle than a cone. 2A46M 125 mm smoothbore gun wi 43 roonds (T-90) 2A46M-5 125 mm smoothbore gun wi 42 roonds (T-90A) Seicontar airmament. If then maybe it racks them? All rights reserved. Only thing that works properly is APFSDS, rest is just trash.

Dryer Cord Strain Relief Clamp Lowe's, Arum Maculatum Poisoning, Cvs Recall Metformin, Ottogi Cooking Wine Recipe, Tv 36 News Channel, Dbd Most Popular Killers, The Heritage Rose Group, Whirlpool Microwave Error Code F134,