For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. Additionally, I really like the simplified look and small upgrades the MP versions offer. And I like the grainy renderings for some scenes.Live View. I have used many rangefinders, a Leica M8, M9 (and its variants M-E/M9P/MM), M262, M240P and of course most recently the M-D 262. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me. Paste as plain text instead, When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage. Using it in this factory, a space where I needed to be aware of the timing of things that were happening around me, it just clicked for me. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). I like Roger a lot hes written for this site before, and we chatted a fair bit around the time. With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. Thanks for posting, enjoyed the images. You can post now and register later. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. Thanks a lot for your replies. So as I said in the first few paragraphs, now its on its way out, I thought I should do it the justice of writing a few parting words about it. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. It has two memory card slots, allowing you to store more photos without switching cards. Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more space. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. As is the image quality of the M10. Something about the idea that it had all these weird and wonderful features made me expect a camera that felt different. My justification for upgrading from the M9 to the Leica M262 was almost more ridiculous than the justifications Im hanging my decisions off moving from M262 to M10. but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water. November 7, 2013 December 8, 2013 Peter . If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. I like to put my camera to my eye this live-view lark just doesnt appeal to me was the sort of sentence I likely uttered. I am primarily a Nikon digital and film shooter, and my quest for minimalism and the fact that I already own a Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera were the major reasons to sell the digital Leica 262. I upgrade cameras, selling them and adding a little bit of funds from what disposable income I do have, also relying on credit a bit too much. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. Verified purchase: Yes | Condition . I used the M240 for over two years before upgrading to the M10 a year and a half ago. Of course they can, but you have them. I currently own a 262. I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. It is the successor to the world's first full-frame mirrorless camera, the LEICA M9 of 2009.. To me this seems like a hassle. This was a heretical change from earlier Leicas. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. You and Roger Hicks. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. How important do you think live view will be for you? But in the context of the fact that functional simplicity is a big part of what attracts people to Leica cameras, its hard not to be impressed by the Leica M262. Id probably buy a new car. p.s. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. Thanks for the insights Louis! Here are photos from my first shoot with it: https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party. 20% better video recording quality (main camera), Has continuous autofocus when recording movies, has continuous autofocus when recording movies. I find it to be a useful feature at times. And then I got a Sony A7riii that lets me touch the screen to pick the subject I want the camera to autofocus on! If you want video and live view, get the 240. If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. Its marquee features are omissions rather than additions: the M-D doesn't . I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life. I took the M240 because it offeres live view. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. Source: DxOMark. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. A week or so later I was on a shoot for work. Dont get me wrong Hamish, if I didnt have to give the Taxman an additional sum equal to a Leica M10 last Spring, Id have been tempted! A larger sensor will capture more light, which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general image quality. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. Looking forward to your impressions, cheers! Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? It unites decades of experience in rangefinder technology with groundbreaking digital technologies: It features a completely newly developed high-resolution full-format CMOS sensor that, in combination with its high-performance processor and the legendary M-Lenses; delivers outstanding . I would have bought a 90 Macro lens if I had live view on the camera even though Ive already got a Nikon with 105 Macro. And sometimes they could come in handy. Using the right SD card is key here. Not because its a bad camera, quite the opposite; its a fantastic camera, I just find there to be so little to report or to get overly excited about. Live-view brings something extra to a type of camera I had previously (possibly quite stubbornly) felt couldnt be improved. Possibly Leica got the Bayer filter from a different supplier making the change needed. No more out of focus shots. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. Your previous content has been restored. The Leica M-D (Typ 262) ($5,995) is the camera for photographers who wish that digital didn't happen. I upgraded from the M9 on single basis that I wanted a camera with a better screen. Yes, the image quality of the Leica M (type 240) is a step down from the Leica M9. Leica m240 sony a7sii . I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. Leica M (Typ 262) The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. There is an M240 feature that can get you there with User Settings, and right now I cant recall how easily accessible that is.In Camera BW filter Simulations. Hes written some good books, too, some with his partner, Frances. This happens with the M240 from time to time. I guess that how much I miss the live-view will define how soon, if at all, I start saving my pennies for a swap. (Leica M Typ 240), Nikon D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS, Sony a6600 + Sony E 18-135mm F3__5-5__6 OSS, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSS, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. Nice write-up. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. I then had a feeling that Im sure a lot of people who have too many cameras have once in a while You might know it yourself? I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. Functionalism be damned. I use the 1.4 magnifier with my old 90mm tele-elmarit and an external viewfinder with my voigtlander 21mm f1.4 both work just fine for me. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. It uses a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor with a near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. The fix is to remove the bottom plate and remove the battery, but this is not a solution for when the decisive moment is at hand.Low Light Performance. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. Compared Usage Recommendations More. It only having felt right once in 6 months felt wrong. But even this hasnt really bothered me too much it might be a little clumsy what with the need to press 3 buttons when you want to change ISO, but the way the auto ISO works pretty much makes up for it. Clear editor. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! I shouldve read the manual! Can you compare side by side, please? No. Other new features include an expanded ISO range of 100 to 50000, 16 minute maximum exposure time, dynamic range equivalent of 13.5 stops, an on-screen level gauge, and super quiet . Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. Leica M Typ 240. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. Whats the best camera for around $2000? Jordan's twin brother Gordon is back to review the cinema-focused Canon EOS R5 C! I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. I remember when live-view first started appearing on interchangeable lens digital cameras. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. I was wondering if you ever ended up upgrading to the M10?